Appellant appealed from the judicial appeal panel's denial of his petition for provision discharge, full discharge, or transfer, arguing that he established a prima facie case for discharge and that the preponderance of the evidence supported a transfer. Appellant was civilly committed as a sexually psychopathic personality (SPP) and a sexually dangerous person (SDP)> The Minnesota Court of Appeals held that appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for provisional or full discharge, and the panel's determination that appellant should not be transferred was not clearly erroneous. Affirmed.
In re Civil Commitment of Senty-Haugen, A-18-0240, Judicial Appeal Panel.
Lynne Torgerson, Esq. was not attorney of record in this case.
Tags: child pornography lawyer, criminal defense attorney, criminal defense lawyer, criminal sexual conduct attorney, criminal sexual conduct lawyer, kidnapping lawyer, prostitution lawyer, rape lawyer, sex crimes lawyer, statutory rape lawyer