Prosecutorial misconduct

Substantial rights not affected

Defendant challenged his conviction of first degree burglary and fifth degree assault, arguing, that he was entitled to a new trial because the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct.  The Minnesota Court of Appeals declined to determine whether any prosecutorial misconduct actually occurred because it concluded that the alleged prosecutorial misconduct did not affect defendant’s substantial rights as the evidence against defendant was strong.  Affirmed.

State v. Needham, A18-0247, Carlton County.

Criminal Defense Attorney Lynne Torgerson was not attorney of record in this case.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

DISCLAIMER: Throughout this website, there are statements on various laws. Please note that this is not legal advice, and no reliance should be taken thereon, and an attorney client relationship is not established hereby. Further, please note that these legal statements may not currently be up to date, because the laws can change daily, and this website does not. Thus, you will always need to actually retain a lawyer to establish an attorney client relationship, to rely upon any advice, and to obtain up-to-date legal research. Thank you.