Defendant challenged the trial court's denial of his motion to correct unauthorized sentences for his convictions of attempted second degree murder and second degree criminal sexual conduct. The Minnesota Court of Appeals determined that the trial court erred by construing defendant's motion to correct an unauthorized sentence as a petition for postconviction relief as it challenged the imposition of a conditional release period and consecutive sentencing, that defendant's consecutive sentences were authorized by law, and that the imposition of a conditional release term for attempted second degree murder was in error. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Bilbro v. State, A17-1566, Hennepin County.
Lynne Torgerson, Esq. was not attorney of record in this case.